It doesn’t matter if you are awesome

There is a lot of advice out there for DMs. What you don’t see a ton of is advice for players. I’ve played with a lot of players: I was in Living Greyhawk from 2002 until its end, which means convention play with random people. I’ve seen a lot of players, and they played even more characters and I saw what worked and what didn’t. I’m not saying I’m an amazing player —I can see something work without having the skill, patience or inclination to do it myself— but I like to think I’ve got a good sense of what works and what doesn’t. From this I’ve learned something that may shock a lot of you:

It doesn’t matter how awesome your character is if they don’t help the party.

The biggest thing that people tend to forget, even really, really skilled gamers that I admire, is that modern D&D is a team game. There are games where players are constantly backstabbing each other and whatnot,  but most games follow the assumption the designers work with: That a team of specialists, go do heroic things as a team.

As I’ve mentioned before, Penny Arcade and Weregeek both describe sports with gaming (MMO) metaphores, and you can easily convert these into gaming terms. Each player in a sport has a job, and they are very good at doing that job. Now, I don’t know sports that well, but even I know that you don’t have all quarterbacks on a football team, or all…um, goalies on a hockey  team. Ok, so I really don’t know sports: I think of it more like a commando team, a group of elite agents working together to beat obstacles that would break lesser foes: I’m told that The Dirty Dozen and Ocean’s Eleven are the archtypical examples of this, but as I haven’t seen those I think of The Mass Effect Series (Mass Effect 2 was 90% building your team), Firefly, The A-Team, Star Trek (The Original Series is the best example), and similarly nerdy things.

Now, look at these teams: For the most part there aren’t any characters that can’t pull their own weight, and have some talent they lend the group. Sure, they are usually fairly competent on their own, but they really work best as a team. Kirk is awesome, but he’d be lost without McCoy putting him back together, Spock advising him, Scotty running the engines, and so on.

So, when making a D&D character don’t think of how you can make them awesome. Think of how you can make them help the team. You aren’t going to be fighting the monsters by yourself, so why should you focus on doing things yourself?

I’m going to try keeping my posts to a reasonable length for the next bit, so I’m going to give examples of some do and do nots next time. Until then, stay geeky.


Published in: on May 13, 2013 at 8:40 am  Comments (4)  
Tags: , , , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

4 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. I think this is starting the conversation in the middle. Players like having control. It’s the main reason for optimization. But players can control what other players do, so they have to build for the worst case scenario in which all cooperation has failed, rather than the best-case.

    • I disagree; Most of the players I meet who are optimizing see a shiny way to do something with the system, and do it, feeling that they are being really awesome and doing something the designers never expected, and gaining a leg up on the game by doing so. What they don’t realize, is they are actually sacrificing important things to do that. I give some examples of really power gamed, but useless characters next week that should help explain this.

      I never saw a character made with the specific intention of out lasting the group (well, possibly in a Vampire game, but that is a very different game then D&D, about politics and such.) Usually, if the entire party dies then a few extra HP won’t save you, and most people know that. People just say “Hey, here is a way that I can never take damage from a minion, that will make my character awesome” and do it, not realizing that not taking damage from minions doesn’t necessarily help the party.

  2. One thing I’ve liked and want to bring into my next gaming session is the way you interconnect backstories using small ‘stories’ in the Dresden Files RPG system. It’s part of character creation; but by giving them a solid way to connect everyone’s characters, you give both a backstory and an idea how these characters work together.

    • While I like that idea in theory, I’ve always found it limiting, in that you’d have to create all the characters for the game at the same time. All the games I’ve ever been in have had characters join once the game has started, leave as the player moved away, miss a few sessions during exams, stuff coming up in real life, and so on. That always stuck me as an impediment to using that type of character creation, though I’d love to hear how it works in play.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: